Pictures of abortion - victims speak. No one can argue with a photo. Photographs of torn bodies of abortion victims testify to and confirm why Save Life exists - to establish the humanity of the unborn and the inhumanity of abortion. We are often told by both pro-life and pro-abortion proponents that it is wrong to show these photos in public because the photos are too upsetting. This opinion is not logical and rational. Save Life shows these photos because they have been proven to save lives. How can anyone claim it's for life if they sincerely believe that not upsetting people is more important than saving babies from abortion? Also, it is not logical if the critic is FOR abortion. An abortion photo simply depicts something someone did to a baby. How is it possible to cause this thing to a baby if it is so horrible even to watch?